Raiding the inarticulate since 2010

accelerated academy acceleration agency AI Algorithmic Authoritarianism and Digital Repression archer Archive Archiving artificial intelligence automation Becoming Who We Are Between Post-Capitalism and Techno-Fascism big data blogging capitalism ChatGPT claude Cognitive Triage: Practice, Culture and Strategies Communicative Escalation and Cultural Abundance: How Do We Cope? Corporate Culture, Elites and Their Self-Understandings craft creativity critical realism data science Defensive Elites Digital Capitalism and Digital Social Science Digital Distraction, Personal Agency and The Reflexive Imperative Digital Elections, Party Politics and Diplomacy digital elites Digital Inequalities Digital Social Science Digital Sociology digital sociology Digital Universities elites Fragile Movements and Their Politics Cultures generative AI higher education Interested labour Lacan Listening LLMs margaret archer Organising personal morphogenesis Philosophy of Technology platform capitalism platforms Post-Democracy, Depoliticisation and Technocracy post-truth psychoanalysis public engagement public sociology publishing Reading realism reflexivity scholarship sexuality Shadow Mobilization, Astroturfing and Manipulation Social Media Social Media for Academics social media for academics social ontology social theory sociology technology The Content Ecosystem The Intensification of Work theory The Political Economy of Digital Capitalism The Technological History of Digital Capitalism Thinking trump twitter Uncategorized work writing zizek

The highly evolved, politicised, social industry-based apparatus of personal destruction

This is a disturbing and insightful piece from Richard Seymour. Highly recommend you subscribe to his Patreon if you haven’t already. He closes with the warning that it’s only “matter of historical contingency, lets say of the vagaries of uneven and combined development, that we do not yet have such a highly evolved, politicised, social industry-based apparatus of personal destruction in the UK” yet:

This matters. Harassment and stalking is a commercial and political strategy of the rightist mediasphere, from Guido Fawkes to Modi’s online armies attacking “presstitutes”, “sickular” intellectuals and “anti-nationals”. As the journalist Swati Chaturvedi has documented, certainly operates a centralised, top-down troll army, as a complement to his wider offensive against journalistic expression and to control cultural output in India. As with the trolling ‘black ops’ used by Duterte, and the ‘office of hate’ allegedly working out of Bolsonaro’s cabinet to intimidate the Supreme Court and opposition politicians, they work to intimidate, smear and incite against rivals. They also impart message discipline to a wider online following.

Those engaged in nationalist cyberwar are very aware that they are not engaged in a battle of ideas. When Bolsonaro acolytes accuse teachers of disseminating gay propaganda, the intention is that they be hounded out of their jobs, or worse. When Modi’s trolls call someone an ‘anti-national’, it is every bit as much a death threat as when Trump links Ilhan Omar to Al Qaeda. “It’s not about destroying ideas,” Olavo de Carvalho, Jair Bolsonaro’s top public intellectual once said, “but destroying the careers and the power of people. You have to be direct, and without respect—that’s very important.” But the efficacy of such efforts depends on authentic users feeling engaged and excited by the messaging of paid trolls.

Those engaged in nationalist cyberwar are very aware that they are not engaged in a battle of ideas. When Bolsonaro acolytes accuse teachers of disseminating gay propaganda, the intention is that they be hounded out of their jobs, or worse. When Modi’s trolls call someone an ‘anti-national’, it is every bit as much a death threat as when Trump links Ilhan Omar to Al Qaeda. “It’s not about destroying ideas,” Olavo de Carvalho, Jair Bolsonaro’s top public intellectual once said, “but destroying the careers and the power of people. You have to be direct, and without respect—that’s very important.” But the efficacy of such efforts depends on authentic users feeling engaged and excited by the messaging of paid trolls.