I found this comparison by Robin Wilton extremely thought-provoking. It’s correct as a statement about why we should treat these skills as fundamental to education. However it glosses over a number of differences and we should be cautious about the comparison:
- While there are corporate interests involved in reading, writing and arithmetic they exercise less power in society at large than big tech
- Connected to this is the fact that these corporate interests in no way control the infrastructure of reading, writing and arithmetic whereas big tech does, at least in a collective sense
- The harms children face in their future use of reading, writing and arithmetic have no connection to the firms who produce instruments for these purposes, as opposed to big tech which is itself a source of the privacy harms it seeks to educate children about
But are we all going to die and 12 years? I would think the important skills would be hunting and fishing and gathering and making clothes from random’s staff not from factories.
I don’t think so but I spend a lot of time talking to someone with the same view!