Raiding the inarticulate since 2010

accelerated academy acceleration agency AI Algorithmic Authoritarianism and Digital Repression archer Archive Archiving artificial intelligence automation Becoming Who We Are Between Post-Capitalism and Techno-Fascism big data blogging capitalism ChatGPT claude Cognitive Triage: Practice, Culture and Strategies Communicative Escalation and Cultural Abundance: How Do We Cope? Corporate Culture, Elites and Their Self-Understandings craft creativity critical realism data science Defensive Elites desire Digital Capitalism and Digital Social Science Digital Distraction, Personal Agency and The Reflexive Imperative Digital Elections, Party Politics and Diplomacy digital elites Digital Inequalities Digital Social Science Digital Sociology digital sociology Digital Universities elites Fragile Movements and Their Politics Cultures generative AI higher education Interested labour Lacan Listening LLMs margaret archer Organising personal morphogenesis Philosophy of Technology platform capitalism platforms populism Post-Democracy, Depoliticisation and Technocracy post-truth psychoanalysis public engagement public sociology publishing Reading realism reflexivity scholarship Shadow Mobilization, Astroturfing and Manipulation Social Media Social Media for Academics social media for academics social ontology social theory sociology technology The Content Ecosystem The Intensification of Work The Political Economy of Digital Capitalism The Technological History of Digital Capitalism Thinking trump twitter Uncategorized work writing zizek

The violence of writing

From Critical Theory Between Klein and Lacan by Mari Ruti and Amy Allen, loc 3213:

Julia Kristeva said something related during one of her lectures that I’ve never forgotten because it helped me to break my writing block. She claimed that the most difficult thing about writing is the violence that you have to inflict in order to carve a path through your knowledge: you have more material in your mind than you can possibly put on the written page, so that you need to make the cut—this has obvious Lacanian resonances—that gives you the path you need; being able to sever the necessary bits of material from all the material that you have is essential for creativity. Many people find this task difficult because it’s uncomfortably violent. The implication is that your inability to be aggressive—your fear of your own aggression—can paralyze you. From this perspective, perfectionism, thinking that you need to fit everything you know into your book, is the Achilles’ heel of writers.

Fwiw the phenomenology of writing is completely different for me. The path emerges in an eerily reliable way if I give myself time and space. The violence comes at the editing stage. There’s a point I have to reach of feeling almost… hostile towards my own meandering, baggy, needlessly elaborate prose at which point I can begin to kill my darlings. Until then I find editing almost impossible. I suspect one of the reasons I find it hard is that I fail to make the cut which Kristeva speaks of here. But one of the reasons I enjoy it so much is that there’s little check on it. There’s a smoothness to the experience which is pretty much endlessly rewarding for me.

Fediverse Reactions