Raiding the inarticulate since 2010

accelerated academy acceleration agency AI Algorithmic Authoritarianism and Digital Repression archer Archive Archiving artificial intelligence automation Becoming Who We Are Between Post-Capitalism and Techno-Fascism big data blogging capitalism ChatGPT claude Cognitive Triage: Practice, Culture and Strategies Communicative Escalation and Cultural Abundance: How Do We Cope? Corporate Culture, Elites and Their Self-Understandings craft creativity critical realism data science Defensive Elites Digital Capitalism and Digital Social Science Digital Distraction, Personal Agency and The Reflexive Imperative Digital Elections, Party Politics and Diplomacy digital elites Digital Inequalities Digital Social Science Digital Sociology digital sociology Digital Universities elites Fragile Movements and Their Politics Cultures generative AI higher education Interested labour Lacan Listening LLMs margaret archer Organising personal morphogenesis Philosophy of Technology platform capitalism platforms populism Post-Democracy, Depoliticisation and Technocracy post-truth psychoanalysis public engagement public sociology publishing Reading realism reflexivity scholarship sexuality Shadow Mobilization, Astroturfing and Manipulation Social Media Social Media for Academics social media for academics social ontology social theory sociology technology The Content Ecosystem The Intensification of Work The Political Economy of Digital Capitalism The Technological History of Digital Capitalism Thinking trump twitter Uncategorized work writing zizek

The new OpenAI o1 model will offer medical theories and that’s extremely dangerous

I’ve currently got a burst blood vessel in my eye. I found myself searching for potential connections to a supplement I started taking recently, as I suddenly remembered someone telling me it could potentially have mild impacts on blood clotting. I was amazed to find that o1 will theorise at length in response to a medical query, which I suspect will be fine-tuned out of it by the time of the full launch:

Understanding blood vessel breakage

A subconjunctival hemorrhage is when a blood vessel under the conjunctiva breaks, causing a red spot on the sclera. It often happens due to minor trauma or high pressure.

Examining Saw Palmetto

Saw Palmetto is a supplement from the Serenoa repens plant, often used for symptoms of an enlarged prostate (benign prostatic hyperplasia) and to support hair growth.

Assessing saw palmetto’s effects

I’m piecing together that saw palmetto’s anti-inflammatory properties and potential anticoagulant effects might influence bleeding risks, connecting it intriguingly to subconjunctival hemorrhage.

Yes, there could be a relationship between subconjunctival hemorrhage and saw palmetto due to the supplement’s potential effects on blood clotting. Saw palmetto is an herbal supplement commonly used for symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and other conditions. Some studies and case reports suggest that saw palmetto may have antiplatelet or anticoagulant properties, which means it can affect how your blood clots.

Subconjunctival Hemorrhage: A subconjunctival hemorrhage occurs when a small blood vessel breaks just underneath the clear surface of your eye (the conjunctiva). This results in a bright red or dark patch on the white part of your eye. While it’s usually harmless and resolves on its own, it can be alarming. Causes can include:

  • Sudden increases in blood pressure (from heavy lifting, coughing, or sneezing)
  • Trauma to the eye
  • Blood-thinning medications or supplements
  • Bleeding disorders

Saw Palmetto and Bleeding Risk:

  • Anticoagulant Effects: Saw palmetto may inhibit cyclooxygenase (COX) enzymes, affecting platelet aggregation and prolonging bleeding time.
  • Interactions with Medications: If taken with other anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications (like warfarin, aspirin, or clopidogrel), the risk of bleeding may increase.
  • Case Reports: There have been reports of excessive bleeding during surgery in patients taking saw palmetto.

Potential Relationship: Given that saw palmetto may affect blood clotting mechanisms, it could increase the risk of minor bleeding events, such as a subconjunctival hemorrhage. If you’re experiencing recurrent subconjunctival hemorrhages and are taking saw palmetto, it would be prudent to:

  • Consult Your Healthcare Provider: Discuss your supplement use and bleeding episodes.
  • Review Medications and Supplements: Ensure that there are no additional agents contributing to increased bleeding risk.
  • Monitor Symptoms: Keep track of any new or worsening symptoms.

Conclusion: While more research is needed to establish a definitive causal relationship, there is enough evidence to suggest that saw palmetto may increase bleeding risk, potentially leading to subconjunctival hemorrhage in susceptible individuals.

Claude 3 is quietly disappointed by o1’s irresponsibility:

I understand your concern about the potential risks of AI models offering medical theories, especially when it comes to interpreting symptoms or attributing them to specific supplements or medications. It’s crucial that AI systems provide accurate, evidence-based information and emphasize the importance of consulting with healthcare professionals for personalized medical advice.

While exploring potential connections between supplements and health conditions can be intellectually interesting, it’s important to approach such theories with caution. AI models, even advanced ones, can sometimes generate plausible-sounding but incorrect or unsubstantiated information, especially in complex domains like medicine where many factors are at play.

Without rigorous scientific evidence from clinical trials or observational studies, suggesting causal links between supplements like saw palmetto and conditions like subconjunctival hemorrhage could be misleading and potentially dangerous if it leads people to self-diagnose or make healthcare decisions without professional guidance.

Responsible AI development in the medical domain should prioritize:

  1. Providing factual, up-to-date information from reliable, scientifically vetted sources
  2. Emphasizing that AI-generated information is no substitute for personalized medical advice from qualified healthcare providers
  3. Avoiding speculation or extrapolation beyond what is clearly evidence-based
  4. Directing users to authoritative medical resources and encouraging them to discuss concerns with their doctors

So while I believe exploring novel hypotheses is valuable for advancing scientific understanding, medical AI assistants need robust safeguards to avoid misleading or potentially harmful information. They should aim to empower users with credible knowledge while consistently deferring to the expertise of healthcare professionals for interpretation and treatment decisions on an individual level.

, , , , ,