Raiding the inarticulate since 2010

accelerated academy acceleration agency AI Algorithmic Authoritarianism and Digital Repression archer Archive Archiving artificial intelligence automation Becoming Who We Are Between Post-Capitalism and Techno-Fascism big data blogging capitalism ChatGPT claude Cognitive Triage: Practice, Culture and Strategies Communicative Escalation and Cultural Abundance: How Do We Cope? Corporate Culture, Elites and Their Self-Understandings craft creativity critical realism data science Defensive Elites Digital Capitalism and Digital Social Science Digital Distraction, Personal Agency and The Reflexive Imperative Digital Elections, Party Politics and Diplomacy digital elites Digital Inequalities Digital Social Science Digital Sociology digital sociology Digital Universities elites Fragile Movements and Their Politics Cultures generative AI higher education Interested labour Lacan Listening LLMs margaret archer Organising personal morphogenesis Philosophy of Technology platform capitalism platforms populism Post-Democracy, Depoliticisation and Technocracy post-truth psychoanalysis public engagement public sociology publishing Reading realism reflexivity scholarship sexuality Shadow Mobilization, Astroturfing and Manipulation Social Media Social Media for Academics social media for academics social ontology social theory sociology technology The Content Ecosystem The Intensification of Work The Political Economy of Digital Capitalism The Technological History of Digital Capitalism Thinking trump twitter Uncategorized work writing zizek

On metronormativity

I was introduced to the concept of ‘metronormativity’ (Jack Halberstam) earlier today and I’m rather taken with it. This is the Wikipedia article which summarises it:

Jack Halberstam relates queer metronormativity to the dominant “story of migration from ‘country’ to ‘town’… a spatial narrative within which the subject moves to a place of tolerance after enduring life in a place of suspicion, persecution, and secrecy.”[3] This narrative purports that the only means of achieving community among LGBT persons, happiness, and open existence is via an urban lifestyle, perhaps devaluing rural existence by way of stereotypes concerning urban and rural ways of life.[4]

Rural people are commonly depicted in media and otherwise as un-intelligent, dirty, and intolerant; these stereotypes and myths persist largely through well-publicized rural hate crimes (e.g. Brandon Teena‘s assault and murder) that seemingly support stereotypes of rural people as violent bigots and of rural LGBT people as mere victims.[4] The propagation and persistence of these myths lend themselves to the assumption that rural LGBT people do not and cannot exist; those who live happily in rural areas are thus denied existence under the dominant view of metronormativity.[4] This invisibility is evident in 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queer_anti-urbanism

I recognise some of this in my friends who grew up in London and/or stayed there after university, unlike myself who left when I finished my undergraduate degree and never went back other than for (often regular) visit. It would be interesting to think about capital cities in these terms as a form of transposable peak metronormativity, sometimes embodied at the level of habitus as much as explicit commitment. I’m suddenly reminded me of a friend of mine (who is well-travelled but has never lived outside of London) loudly remarking “I’d forgotten what Saturday night is like in the provinces” when we walked into my local Weatherspoons in Coventry. To be fair to him he winced as much as I did and his point was mostly about the way in which people were dressed up for a night out in a seemingly local pub. But it also revealed something a little unpleasant about how he viewed the relationship between London and Coventry.

, , , ,