big data, post-democracy and boardroom liberalism

Mark
November 8, 2015

Post navigation

←→

Archives

  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in

Skip to content
  • Home
  • Get In Touch
  • Home
  • Home
  • Home

big data, post-democracy and boardroom liberalism

Another interesting bit of the Andrejevic book. A lot of these ideas are extremely familiar but he puts them together in extremely creative ways, as well as writing with an astonishing degree of lucidity. From loc 524:

Lurking in these two questions is an assumption about the character of knowledge in the digital era: the notion that the only limit on our predictive power is the ability to effectively organize all the available information. If this were indeed the case, then the development of technological information storage and processing technology might compensate for the shortcomings of the human brain by ushering in new forms of aggregate “knowledge” and predictive power.

And from loc 572:

The apparent obstacle to such a resolution is the limit of human perceptions, analytic ability, and time. The ability to overcome such limits is relegated to the realm of the superhuman. As Laplace, the pioneer of mathematical probability, put it, “Given for one instant an intelligence which could comprehend all the forces by which nature is animated and the respective situation of the beings who compose it – an intelligence sufficiently vast to submit these data to analysis … for it, nothing would be uncertain and the future, as the past, would be present to its eyes.” 8 The name for that intelligence, viewed through one historical lens, would be God. In the digital era, it is the computer and the database.

There’s a profoundly post-democratic slide underway here, building upon longer term trends which have led to a hollowing out of representative democracy. What I find concerning is the frequent assumption, in many cases a self-serving one, that social and political problems will melt away through the sustained accumulation of data. The well-reported wonkishness of Obama goes some way to explaining what has been called his ‘boardroom liberalism’. I suspect his sponsorship of the government data science service, using his power to institutionalise data science throughout the federal government, might very well turn out to be one of the most significant actions of his presidency.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)

Related

This entry was posted in Archive and tagged Algorithmic Authoritarianism and Digital Repression, big data, data science, Digital Capitalism and Digital Social Science, obama, post-democracy, Post-Democracy, Depoliticisation and Technocracy. Bookmark the permalink.

Website Powered by WordPress.com.

  • Follow Following
    • Mark Carrigan
    • Join 5,587 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Mark Carrigan
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.