Raiding the inarticulate since 2010

accelerated academy acceleration agency AI Algorithmic Authoritarianism and Digital Repression archer Archive Archiving artificial intelligence automation Becoming Who We Are Between Post-Capitalism and Techno-Fascism big data blogging capitalism ChatGPT claude Cognitive Triage: Practice, Culture and Strategies Communicative Escalation and Cultural Abundance: How Do We Cope? Corporate Culture, Elites and Their Self-Understandings craft creativity critical realism data science Defensive Elites desire Digital Capitalism and Digital Social Science Digital Distraction, Personal Agency and The Reflexive Imperative Digital Elections, Party Politics and Diplomacy digital elites Digital Inequalities Digital Social Science Digital Sociology digital sociology Digital Universities elites Fragile Movements and Their Politics Cultures generative AI higher education Interested labour Lacan Listening LLMs margaret archer Organising personal morphogenesis Philosophy of Technology platform capitalism platforms populism Post-Democracy, Depoliticisation and Technocracy post-truth psychoanalysis public engagement public sociology publishing Reading realism reflexivity scholarship Shadow Mobilization, Astroturfing and Manipulation Social Media Social Media for Academics social media for academics social ontology social theory sociology technology The Content Ecosystem The Intensification of Work The Political Economy of Digital Capitalism The Technological History of Digital Capitalism Thinking trump twitter Uncategorized work writing zizek

We are poised on the shore of a new continent

From Jessica Benjamin’s Beyond Doer and Done To loc 2,948:

So it is not merely the analyst’s subjectivity that is finally irreducible (Renik, 1993); it is the fact of mutuality, which must be embraced in all its complexity and vitality or avoided at peril of both partners losing their subjectivity. Knowing that once our subjectivity is freely acknowledged, we must face our own demons and assume responsibility for them, we are poised on the shore of a new continent, and now, together, must all pay close attention to what happens next.

This immediately made me think of one of my favourite sections of The Four Quartets:

So I find words I never thought to speak
In streets I never thought I should revisit
When I left my body on a distant shore.

I’ve rarely experienced such an immediate poetic association when reading theory. I think the reason my psyche threw it up is the sense in which “words I never thought to speak in streets I never thought I should revisit” carries a sense of novelty coupled with familiarity. It’s about revisiting, returning, renewing. In that moment of encounter which Benjamin describes there is a novelty which emerges within the familiar. A new way of relating to what has long been part of existence. It feels like Eliot is describing this movement from the individual’s perspective. A few lines earlier:

For last year’s words belong to last year’s language
And next year’s words await another voice.

It’s clear that Benjamin’s image is mutual and prospective. Two people standing on the shore together. Whereas Eliot’s image is individual and retrospective, looking back on a change that has occurred in terms of an individual’s own individuality. But there’s still a deep resonance here I think in terms of the shore as a threshold through which change happens within the parameters of the familiar.