Raiding the inarticulate since 2010

accelerated academy acceleration agency AI Algorithmic Authoritarianism and Digital Repression archer Archive Archiving artificial intelligence automation Becoming Who We Are Between Post-Capitalism and Techno-Fascism big data blogging capitalism ChatGPT claude Cognitive Triage: Practice, Culture and Strategies Communicative Escalation and Cultural Abundance: How Do We Cope? Corporate Culture, Elites and Their Self-Understandings craft creativity critical realism data science Defensive Elites Digital Capitalism and Digital Social Science Digital Distraction, Personal Agency and The Reflexive Imperative Digital Elections, Party Politics and Diplomacy digital elites Digital Inequalities Digital Social Science Digital Sociology digital sociology Digital Universities elites Fragile Movements and Their Politics Cultures generative AI higher education Interested labour Lacan Listening LLMs margaret archer Organising personal morphogenesis Philosophy of Technology platform capitalism platforms Post-Democracy, Depoliticisation and Technocracy post-truth psychoanalysis public engagement public sociology publishing Reading realism reflexivity scholarship sexuality Shadow Mobilization, Astroturfing and Manipulation Social Media Social Media for Academics social media for academics social ontology social theory sociology technology The Content Ecosystem The Intensification of Work theory The Political Economy of Digital Capitalism The Technological History of Digital Capitalism Thinking trump twitter Uncategorized work writing zizek

“Generative AI for Academics is a brisk, sensible map for using LLMs in scholarly life”

Another good review of Generative AI for Academics, this time from the data scientist Bruno Gonçalves. Very interesting to see how this has been received from a more technical perspective:

Mark Carrigan’s “Generative AI for Academics“ is a brisk, sensible map for using LLMs in scholarly life. It avoids both hype and doom, treating generative AI as a set of tools that demand judgment, not blind adoption. The tone is practical and reflective—ideal for faculty, PIs, and grad students who need shared language and guardrails.

The book shines in how it organizes academic work (Thinking, Collaborating, Communicating, Engaging), then pairs each with concrete practices (rubber-ducking, draft refinement, critical oversight). It isn’t a prompt cookbook or a windy manifesto; it’s a clear framework for responsible use, culture-setting, and policy discussions in departments and labs.