Raiding the inarticulate since 2010

accelerated academy acceleration agency AI Algorithmic Authoritarianism and Digital Repression archer Archive Archiving artificial intelligence automation Becoming Who We Are Between Post-Capitalism and Techno-Fascism big data blogging capitalism ChatGPT claude Cognitive Triage: Practice, Culture and Strategies Communicative Escalation and Cultural Abundance: How Do We Cope? Corporate Culture, Elites and Their Self-Understandings craft creativity critical realism data science Defensive Elites Digital Capitalism and Digital Social Science Digital Distraction, Personal Agency and The Reflexive Imperative Digital Elections, Party Politics and Diplomacy digital elites Digital Inequalities Digital Social Science Digital Sociology digital sociology Digital Universities elites Fragile Movements and Their Politics Cultures generative AI higher education Interested labour Lacan Listening LLMs margaret archer Organising personal morphogenesis Philosophy of Technology platform capitalism platforms populism Post-Democracy, Depoliticisation and Technocracy post-truth psychoanalysis public engagement public sociology publishing Reading realism reflexivity scholarship sexuality Shadow Mobilization, Astroturfing and Manipulation Social Media Social Media for Academics social media for academics social ontology social theory sociology technology The Content Ecosystem The Intensification of Work The Political Economy of Digital Capitalism The Technological History of Digital Capitalism Thinking trump twitter Uncategorized work writing zizek

An agenda for repurposing AI in higher education

This is excellent from Helen Beetham, part of a longer essay about the harms of AI in education:

Repurpose AI technologies, where possible, for projects of authentic learning and human flourishing e.g.:

  • Develop small scale models using open data and APIs, publicly or community owned, that meet real local needs for learning and cultural expression;
  • Design curricula that support inquiry into AI, its inequities and harms and wider contexts as well as its opportunities for use;
  • Deliver learning activities with/without AI that reveal its fragilities, fabrications and breaking points:
  • Teach and actively support counter-hegemonic data projects: feminist, decolonial, minority-cultural, public and sustainable projects, projects of data sovereignty and data justice;
  • Undertake independent research into the social, cultural, developmental and longitudinal impacts of AI in education;
  • Encourage slow scholarship and slow learning with AI, refusing speed and productivity to focus on quality and interpretability;
  • In all of these activities, refuse anthropomorphism: describe precisely how models produce their outputs and how human agency is involved;
  • Be alert to the constraints and contradictions that become visible in these repurposings: notice, teach, discuss and make known the mechanisms and meanings of AI