Raiding the inarticulate since 2010

accelerated academy acceleration agency AI Algorithmic Authoritarianism and Digital Repression archer Archive Archiving artificial intelligence automation Becoming Who We Are Between Post-Capitalism and Techno-Fascism big data blogging capitalism ChatGPT claude Cognitive Triage: Practice, Culture and Strategies Communicative Escalation and Cultural Abundance: How Do We Cope? Corporate Culture, Elites and Their Self-Understandings craft creativity critical realism data science Defensive Elites Digital Capitalism and Digital Social Science Digital Distraction, Personal Agency and The Reflexive Imperative Digital Elections, Party Politics and Diplomacy digital elites Digital Inequalities Digital Social Science Digital Sociology digital sociology Digital Universities elites Fragile Movements and Their Politics Cultures generative AI higher education Interested labour Lacan Listening LLMs margaret archer Organising personal morphogenesis Philosophy of Technology platform capitalism platforms populism Post-Democracy, Depoliticisation and Technocracy post-truth psychoanalysis public engagement public sociology publishing Reading realism reflexivity scholarship sexuality Shadow Mobilization, Astroturfing and Manipulation Social Media Social Media for Academics social media for academics social ontology social theory sociology technology The Content Ecosystem The Intensification of Work The Political Economy of Digital Capitalism The Technological History of Digital Capitalism Thinking trump twitter Uncategorized work writing zizek

René Girard as reductive Lacanianism

With the huge caveat I’m basing this entirely on a documentary, I was struck by the overlap between René Girard and Lacan’s analysis of desire. Both seek to address the question “why do we want what we want?” but Girard does it through a singular concept of mimesis, the essentially imitative nature of desire. We want what someone else wants, perhaps imagining the happiness we impute to them will become ours if we get it. Once you give concrete examples of mimetic desire it starts to sound very Lacanian. Likewise the focus on overcoming mimetic desire, which is a similar impulse to the Lacanian clinical aim of learning to ‘enjoy your enjoyment’ rather than being trapped in the impulse to placate the Other.

While he recognises this can take many forms it seems like he’s essentially trying to map desire but on a much more straight forward graph then Lacan’s famously bewildering graphs of desire 👇

Very interesting looking paper about this to explore later: https://www.journal-psychoanalysis.eu/articles/a-triangle-of-thoughts-girard-freud-lacan/

Fediverse Reactions