Raiding the inarticulate since 2010

accelerated academy acceleration agency AI Algorithmic Authoritarianism and Digital Repression archer Archive Archiving artificial intelligence automation Becoming Who We Are Between Post-Capitalism and Techno-Fascism big data blogging capitalism ChatGPT claude Cognitive Triage: Practice, Culture and Strategies Communicative Escalation and Cultural Abundance: How Do We Cope? Corporate Culture, Elites and Their Self-Understandings craft creativity critical realism data science Defensive Elites Digital Capitalism and Digital Social Science Digital Distraction, Personal Agency and The Reflexive Imperative Digital Elections, Party Politics and Diplomacy digital elites Digital Inequalities Digital Social Science Digital Sociology digital sociology Digital Universities elites Fragile Movements and Their Politics Cultures generative AI higher education Interested labour Lacan Listening LLMs margaret archer Organising personal morphogenesis Philosophy of Technology platform capitalism platforms populism Post-Democracy, Depoliticisation and Technocracy post-truth psychoanalysis public engagement public sociology publishing Reading realism reflexivity scholarship sexuality Shadow Mobilization, Astroturfing and Manipulation Social Media Social Media for Academics social media for academics social ontology social theory sociology technology The Content Ecosystem The Intensification of Work The Political Economy of Digital Capitalism The Technological History of Digital Capitalism Thinking trump twitter Uncategorized work writing zizek

Interview with Inside Higher Education about AI text books

From this piece about the controversial UCLA literature textbook:

Mark Carrigan, a senior lecturer in education at the University of Manchester who wrote the forthcoming book Generative AI for Academics, said in an email to Inside Higher Ed that while the prospect of AI replacing professors isn’t “an immediate threat,” he is concerned “that tasks could be gradually transferred to AI in ways which fundamentally change what it means to be an academic.”

And without developing “clear professional norms around how we use these tools,” Carrigan said, “we risk sleepwalking into an outcome where human scholarship becomes increasingly confined to elite institutions, while the rest of the sector becomes progressively automated in response to financial pressures and institutional incentives.”

https://www.insidehighered.com/news/faculty-issues/learning-assessment/2024/12/13/ai-assisted-textbook-ucla-has-some-academics