Raiding the inarticulate since 2010

accelerated academy acceleration agency AI Algorithmic Authoritarianism and Digital Repression archer Archive Archiving artificial intelligence automation Becoming Who We Are Between Post-Capitalism and Techno-Fascism big data blogging capitalism ChatGPT claude Cognitive Triage: Practice, Culture and Strategies Communicative Escalation and Cultural Abundance: How Do We Cope? Corporate Culture, Elites and Their Self-Understandings craft creativity critical realism data science Defensive Elites Digital Capitalism and Digital Social Science Digital Distraction, Personal Agency and The Reflexive Imperative Digital Elections, Party Politics and Diplomacy digital elites Digital Inequalities Digital Social Science Digital Sociology digital sociology Digital Universities elites Fragile Movements and Their Politics Cultures generative AI higher education Interested labour Lacan Listening LLMs margaret archer Organising personal morphogenesis Philosophy of Technology platform capitalism platforms populism Post-Democracy, Depoliticisation and Technocracy post-truth psychoanalysis public engagement public sociology publishing Reading realism reflexivity scholarship sexuality Shadow Mobilization, Astroturfing and Manipulation Social Media Social Media for Academics social media for academics social ontology social theory sociology technology The Content Ecosystem The Intensification of Work The Political Economy of Digital Capitalism The Technological History of Digital Capitalism Thinking trump twitter Uncategorized work writing zizek

GenAI beyond the bubble

What will be left after the GenAI bubble bursts? Probably quite a lot given the accelerating capital investment which big tech firms are making in AI ๐Ÿ‘‡

Over the last two years I’ve argued consistently that conflating large language models (as a technological development) with ‘Generative AI’ (as a hype cycle and market bubble) is obviously mistaken. The two things have been tightly coupled together since the launch of OpenAI’s ChatGTP in November 2022 but it’s likely we’ll seen a decoupling over the coming months. I’m convinced the bursting of the bubble is getting closer but utterly unconvinced this means the technology will vanish, as some seem to be imagining. In fact I think the meaningful grappling with the technology can really begin at that stage, away from the dynamic astutely identified here:

Both groups of companies forgot the โ€œmake something people wantโ€ mantra. The generality of LLMs allowed developers to fool themselves into thinking that they were exempt from the need to find a product-market fit, as if prompting a model to perform a task is a replacement for carefully designed products or features.

https://www.aisnakeoil.com/p/ai-companies-are-pivoting-from-creating