Raiding the inarticulate since 2010

accelerated academy acceleration agency AI Algorithmic Authoritarianism and Digital Repression archer Archive Archiving artificial intelligence automation Becoming Who We Are Between Post-Capitalism and Techno-Fascism big data blogging capitalism ChatGPT claude Cognitive Triage: Practice, Culture and Strategies Communicative Escalation and Cultural Abundance: How Do We Cope? Corporate Culture, Elites and Their Self-Understandings craft creativity critical realism data science Defensive Elites Digital Capitalism and Digital Social Science Digital Distraction, Personal Agency and The Reflexive Imperative Digital Elections, Party Politics and Diplomacy digital elites Digital Inequalities Digital Social Science Digital Sociology digital sociology Digital Universities elites Fragile Movements and Their Politics Cultures generative AI higher education Interested labour Lacan Listening LLMs margaret archer Organising personal morphogenesis Philosophy of Technology platform capitalism platforms populism Post-Democracy, Depoliticisation and Technocracy post-truth psychoanalysis public engagement public sociology publishing Reading realism reflexivity scholarship sexuality Shadow Mobilization, Astroturfing and Manipulation Social Media Social Media for Academics social media for academics social ontology social theory sociology technology The Content Ecosystem The Intensification of Work The Political Economy of Digital Capitalism The Technological History of Digital Capitalism Thinking trump twitter Uncategorized work writing zizek

Generative AI and the Enjoyment of Academic Writing

In this episode of Generative Dialogues, Mark Carrigan and Helen Beetham engage in a thought-provoking discussion about the intersection of writing, creativity, and generative AI. Drawing on their personal experiences and academic insights, they explore the nuanced ways AI is reshaping our relationship with writing and intellectual inquiry.

Key topics covered:

  1. Writing as self-discovery: Mark shares his journey of using AI as a tool for creative exploration, likening it to blogging and the process of articulating inchoate thoughts.
  2. AI as a literary interlocutor: The conversation delves into Mark’s unique approach to engaging with AI systems, particularly Claude, as a form of literary dialogue rather than simple prompting.
  3. Reflexivity and creativity: Helen and Mark discuss how AI interactions can enhance meta-reflexivity and serve as a catalyst for creativity, particularly for those who approach it with a questioning, analytical mindset.
  4. The nature of machine creativity: They explore the differences between human creativity, with its biographical elements, and the combinatorial creativity of AI systems.
  5. AI as cultural technology: Mark describes his shifting perspective on AI, from viewing it as quasi-intelligent to seeing it as a cultural technology we must learn to navigate.
  6. Commercialization concerns: The discussion touches on worries about how commercial interests might shape AI interfaces and user experiences, potentially limiting their reflective potential.
  7. Writing enjoyment and AI: They consider how generative AI could potentially encourage greater satisfaction in writing rather than threaten it, if approached thoughtfully.
  8. Ethical and societal implications: The conversation extends to broader concerns about AI’s impact on society, including its potential effects on human relationships and therapeutic practices.

This wide-ranging dialogue offers listeners a nuanced exploration of generative AI’s impact on writing and creative processes, blending personal reflection, theoretical insights, and forward-looking analysis. Mark and Helen’s conversation provides valuable perspectives for writers, academics, and anyone interested in the future of human-AI interaction in intellectual and creative pursuits.

, ,
, ,