Raiding the inarticulate since 2010

accelerated academy acceleration agency AI Algorithmic Authoritarianism and Digital Repression archer Archive Archiving artificial intelligence automation Becoming Who We Are Between Post-Capitalism and Techno-Fascism big data blogging capitalism ChatGPT claude Cognitive Triage: Practice, Culture and Strategies Communicative Escalation and Cultural Abundance: How Do We Cope? Corporate Culture, Elites and Their Self-Understandings craft creativity critical realism data science Defensive Elites Digital Capitalism and Digital Social Science Digital Distraction, Personal Agency and The Reflexive Imperative Digital Elections, Party Politics and Diplomacy digital elites Digital Inequalities Digital Social Science Digital Sociology digital sociology Digital Universities elites Fragile Movements and Their Politics Cultures generative AI higher education Interested labour Lacan Listening LLMs margaret archer Organising personal morphogenesis Philosophy of Technology platform capitalism platforms Post-Democracy, Depoliticisation and Technocracy post-truth psychoanalysis public engagement public sociology publishing Reading realism reflexivity scholarship sexuality Shadow Mobilization, Astroturfing and Manipulation Social Media Social Media for Academics social media for academics social ontology social theory sociology technology The Content Ecosystem The Intensification of Work theory The Political Economy of Digital Capitalism The Technological History of Digital Capitalism Thinking trump twitter Uncategorized work writing zizek

From foxes and hedgehogs to menders and knockers: Berlin’s other distinction

From Nikhil Krishnan’s (excellent) A Terribly Serious Adventure: Philosophy at Oxford 1900-60 pg 89:

‘Temperamentally’, Berlin later said, ‘some people like mending the wall and some people like knocking holes in it. Austin was … a hole-knocker, and Freddie was a mender”.

What I particularly about this is that it opens up four categories, each with a distinct intellectual style:

This is a quick taxonomy produced with Claude 3.5 about the intellectual style for each of these categories:

  • Fox Menders:
    • Versatile thinkers who use their broad knowledge to reinforce and improve existing systems
    • Tend to see nuances and apply diverse ideas to strengthen established frameworks
    • Might be seen as reformers who work within the system, using varied approaches
  • Hedgehog Menders:
    • Focused intellectuals who deeply understand and reinforce a central idea or system
    • Use their specialized knowledge to fortify and expand upon core principles
    • Often seen as traditionalists or experts who refine and perfect established theories
  • Fox Knockers:
    • Multidisciplinary thinkers who challenge established ideas from various angles
    • Use their wide-ranging knowledge to identify weaknesses in different systems
    • Often innovators or critics who draw connections between disparate fields to question norms
  • Hedgehog Knockers:
    • Focused intellectuals who use their deep understanding of a single idea to challenge broader systems
    • Apply their specialized knowledge to expose flaws in established thinking
    • Might be seen as revolutionaries or iconoclasts who overturn paradigms based on a central insight