Raiding the inarticulate since 2010

accelerated academy acceleration agency AI Algorithmic Authoritarianism and Digital Repression archer Archive Archiving artificial intelligence automation Becoming Who We Are Between Post-Capitalism and Techno-Fascism big data blogging capitalism ChatGPT claude Cognitive Triage: Practice, Culture and Strategies Communicative Escalation and Cultural Abundance: How Do We Cope? Corporate Culture, Elites and Their Self-Understandings craft creativity critical realism data science Defensive Elites Digital Capitalism and Digital Social Science Digital Distraction, Personal Agency and The Reflexive Imperative Digital Elections, Party Politics and Diplomacy digital elites Digital Inequalities Digital Social Science Digital Sociology digital sociology Digital Universities elites Fragile Movements and Their Politics Cultures generative AI higher education Interested labour Lacan Listening LLMs margaret archer Organising personal morphogenesis Philosophy of Technology platform capitalism platforms populism Post-Democracy, Depoliticisation and Technocracy post-truth psychoanalysis public engagement public sociology publishing Reading realism reflexivity scholarship sexuality Shadow Mobilization, Astroturfing and Manipulation Social Media Social Media for Academics social media for academics social ontology social theory sociology technology The Content Ecosystem The Intensification of Work The Political Economy of Digital Capitalism The Technological History of Digital Capitalism Thinking trump twitter Uncategorized work writing zizek

Computational sociology of knowledge as a tool for redesigning the knowledge system

This lecture blew my mind in the best possible way. It’s too late to reorientate Generative AI for Academics along these lines but I’m going to be spending a lot of time over the coming months engaging with James Evans and the work of the Knowledge Lab. Among other things I want to understand (a) what status the political economy of knowledge production has in this account (b) whether Archer’s account of cultural dynamics provides a theoretical framework which can bridge the description and explanatory aspects of this.

I didn’t catch who asked the first question but round of applause for this guy 👏

I’m a little concerned that you’re using AI as a band aid for structural problems in the incentive system which we should be changing instead of just accepting that we are lemmings and can only be unlemmingfied by accident and therefore AI has to step in to fragment us.