Raiding the inarticulate since 2010

accelerated academy acceleration agency AI Algorithmic Authoritarianism and Digital Repression archer Archive Archiving artificial intelligence automation Becoming Who We Are Between Post-Capitalism and Techno-Fascism big data blogging capitalism ChatGPT claude Cognitive Triage: Practice, Culture and Strategies Communicative Escalation and Cultural Abundance: How Do We Cope? Corporate Culture, Elites and Their Self-Understandings craft creativity critical realism data science Defensive Elites Digital Capitalism and Digital Social Science Digital Distraction, Personal Agency and The Reflexive Imperative Digital Elections, Party Politics and Diplomacy digital elites Digital Inequalities Digital Social Science Digital Sociology digital sociology Digital Universities elites Fragile Movements and Their Politics Cultures generative AI higher education Interested labour Lacan Listening LLMs margaret archer Organising personal morphogenesis Philosophy of Technology platform capitalism platforms populism Post-Democracy, Depoliticisation and Technocracy post-truth psychoanalysis public engagement public sociology publishing Reading realism reflexivity scholarship sexuality Shadow Mobilization, Astroturfing and Manipulation Social Media Social Media for Academics social media for academics social ontology social theory sociology technology The Content Ecosystem The Intensification of Work The Political Economy of Digital Capitalism The Technological History of Digital Capitalism Thinking trump twitter Uncategorized work writing zizek

Why are conspiracy theories coalescing into a heterogenous world view?

I’ve thought for the last year this is an urgent question which I’ve yet to see an adequate answer to. What is it about the cultural machinery of platform capitalism which facilitates the coalescence of incredibly heterogeneous elements (wellness culture, anti-globalisation, QANon, anti-lockdown, anti-pharma, ‘save the children’ etc) into the ‘truth community’? Was this always going to happen once media infrastructure increased the likelihood of overlapping groups with a common meta-paranoia meeting each other? Is it the grifters and influencers driving this process or are they an epiphenomenon of the media infrastructures? Is there something more going on here?


(In Naomi Klein’s new book she suggests what unites these aspects is a common rebellion against collectivity and interdependency, asserting the sovereignty of the individual. Perhaps this is the mirror image of what I describe above as a ‘meta-paranoia’?)