Raiding the inarticulate since 2010

accelerated academy acceleration agency AI Algorithmic Authoritarianism and Digital Repression archer Archive Archiving artificial intelligence automation Becoming Who We Are Between Post-Capitalism and Techno-Fascism big data blogging capitalism ChatGPT claude Cognitive Triage: Practice, Culture and Strategies Communicative Escalation and Cultural Abundance: How Do We Cope? Corporate Culture, Elites and Their Self-Understandings craft creativity critical realism data science Defensive Elites Digital Capitalism and Digital Social Science Digital Distraction, Personal Agency and The Reflexive Imperative Digital Elections, Party Politics and Diplomacy digital elites Digital Inequalities Digital Social Science Digital Sociology digital sociology Digital Universities elites Fragile Movements and Their Politics Cultures generative AI higher education Interested labour Lacan Listening LLMs margaret archer Organising personal morphogenesis Philosophy of Technology platform capitalism platforms Post-Democracy, Depoliticisation and Technocracy post-truth psychoanalysis public engagement public sociology publishing Reading realism reflexivity scholarship sexuality Shadow Mobilization, Astroturfing and Manipulation Social Media Social Media for Academics social media for academics social ontology social theory sociology technology The Content Ecosystem The Intensification of Work theory The Political Economy of Digital Capitalism The Technological History of Digital Capitalism Thinking trump twitter Uncategorized work writing zizek

The business case for generative AI in organisations will be surveillance

I’ve been suggesting for a while that generative AI will create new forms of accounting, evaluation and surveillance within organisations. What hadn’t struck me until recently was how intrinsically connected these functions are, based around new capacities to qualitatively summarise (as opposed to quantitatively track) real-time behaviour within organisations. Transactional data will become human readable with potentially huge implications for the digital epistemology which has been building up around us over the last two decades. This is how a prominent start-up offering organisational solutions talks about this promise:

Right now we’re hand-designing information flows and team structure. Instead, let’s use LLMs to share information between teams and help route important work to the right people.

• LLMs can summarize what work everyone does in an organization by parsing over their code, messages, and documents.

• LLMs in conjunction with other AI techniques can also identify common problems in an organization and rank them by severity.

• These models can then group the work of each team member by reviewing their code, messages, and documents, providing a comprehensive summary of their roles.

• We can then route important information to the right people in the organization who have the relevant expertise.

https://blog.mutable.ai/p/the-ai-organization-part-i?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

The impulse to summarise based on real activity gets to heart of organisational efficiency, but it also provides a mandate for a vast expansion of real time surveillance. What they describe as “unified AI driven information flow linking all stakeholders” has a mirror-image of total surveillance within organisations, in which all actions become legible in ways which are intensely sinister when filtered through hierarchical relations.