Raiding the inarticulate since 2010

accelerated academy acceleration agency AI Algorithmic Authoritarianism and Digital Repression archer Archive Archiving artificial intelligence automation Becoming Who We Are Between Post-Capitalism and Techno-Fascism big data blogging capitalism ChatGPT claude Cognitive Triage: Practice, Culture and Strategies Communicative Escalation and Cultural Abundance: How Do We Cope? Corporate Culture, Elites and Their Self-Understandings craft creativity critical realism data science Defensive Elites Digital Capitalism and Digital Social Science Digital Distraction, Personal Agency and The Reflexive Imperative Digital Elections, Party Politics and Diplomacy digital elites Digital Inequalities Digital Social Science Digital Sociology digital sociology Digital Universities elites Fragile Movements and Their Politics Cultures generative AI higher education Interested labour Lacan Listening LLMs margaret archer Organising personal morphogenesis Philosophy of Technology platform capitalism platforms populism Post-Democracy, Depoliticisation and Technocracy post-truth psychoanalysis public engagement public sociology publishing Reading realism reflexivity scholarship sexuality Shadow Mobilization, Astroturfing and Manipulation Social Media Social Media for Academics social media for academics social ontology social theory sociology technology The Content Ecosystem The Intensification of Work The Political Economy of Digital Capitalism The Technological History of Digital Capitalism Thinking trump twitter Uncategorized work writing zizek

Personal change as paradigm shift

I found this interview when searching for videos with the psychiatrist, philosopher and literary scholar Iain McGilchrist. I was initially put off by the fact Jordan Peterson was the interviewer, as I suspect many readers of my blog will be, but this is a genuinely fascinating interview.

McGilchrist conceives of the two hemispheres of the brain as following different logics below the level of conscious awareness: exploring and grasping, opening and closing, connecting and isolating. The right hemisphere is orientated towards the detection of anomalies, creating two possibilities for responses: establishing it’s not an anomaly so things can continue as ‘normal’ or exploring the implications of anomalies for necessary changes within your conceptual scheme. Peterson cites Jung’s ideas about the accumulation of these anomalies being played in out the logic of dreams, leading to a sense of the sand shifting in our lives. As we recognise patterns in these anomalies, a counter-hypothesis begins to form which can lead to a dramatic transition in the structure of the personality. He frames this in Kuhnian terms as a ‘descent into chaos’ which precedes the articulation of a new conceptual scheme. But there’s epistemic progress because the new scheme incorporates the old scheme, as well as the anomalies.

McGilchrist describes being in the “slightly unstable position” between what Peterson terms chaos and order. Peterson suggests this is a matter of “encountering as much uncertainty as you can voluntarily tolerate”. The point they’re both driving at is finding a dynamic equilibrium between these hemispheric impulses towards identifying and rejecting anomalies, isolating aspects of your experience and connecting them, exploring the context and grasping at elements within it. Peterson makes the plausible suggestion this is the core insight of Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development: the constructive space in which we are challenging ourselves within the limits of our latent capabilities. He suggests meaning emerges at this point of balance where you are simultaneously mastering your domain but expanding the scope of that domain.