Raiding the inarticulate since 2010

accelerated academy acceleration agency AI Algorithmic Authoritarianism and Digital Repression archer Archive Archiving artificial intelligence automation Becoming Who We Are Between Post-Capitalism and Techno-Fascism big data blogging capitalism ChatGPT claude Cognitive Triage: Practice, Culture and Strategies Communicative Escalation and Cultural Abundance: How Do We Cope? Corporate Culture, Elites and Their Self-Understandings craft creativity critical realism data science Defensive Elites Digital Capitalism and Digital Social Science Digital Distraction, Personal Agency and The Reflexive Imperative Digital Elections, Party Politics and Diplomacy digital elites Digital Inequalities Digital Social Science Digital Sociology digital sociology Digital Universities elites Fragile Movements and Their Politics Cultures generative AI higher education Interested labour Lacan Listening LLMs margaret archer Organising personal morphogenesis Philosophy of Technology platform capitalism platforms Post-Democracy, Depoliticisation and Technocracy post-truth psychoanalysis public engagement public sociology publishing Reading realism reflexivity scholarship sexuality Shadow Mobilization, Astroturfing and Manipulation Social Media Social Media for Academics social media for academics social ontology social theory sociology technology The Content Ecosystem The Intensification of Work theory The Political Economy of Digital Capitalism The Technological History of Digital Capitalism Thinking trump twitter Uncategorized work writing zizek

The new digital divide: the generatively rich and the generatively poor?

What will premium models of generative AI mean for social inequalities? I’ve been assuming that the baseline technology will become ubiquitous because it’s a vector through which tech giants will fight for consumers amidst an unprecedented downturn. But this short aside in a thoughtful piece on WonkHE makes me wonder if this could be the foundation for a fundamental asymmetry between the generatively poor (reliant on mass market tools) and the generatively rich (who can access subscription tools):

Capabilities and terms of use could change at any point at the whim of owners and operators. For example, ChatGPT is a trained language model owned and operated by some of the biggest tech investors in the world: Peter Thiel, Sam Altman, and Elon Musk to name a few. There is already a premium model (faster responses, more reliable access) and it is not unreasonable to suppose that paid for AI will outstrip the current free and freemium models.

https://wonkhe.com/blogs/chatgpt-assessment-and-cheating-have-we-tried-trusting-students/

If we see this in terms of a digital divide, there are second order divides (the skills/capacities to productively use the technology) and third order divides (the social outgrowths of these inequalities) likely to follow from this. This suggests an ethical responsibility to address the second order divides preemptively by supporting students in develop the capacity to work constructively with generative AI. The older idea of the big data divide seems relevant here as well.

, , ,
,