Raiding the inarticulate since 2010

accelerated academy acceleration agency AI Algorithmic Authoritarianism and Digital Repression archer Archive Archiving artificial intelligence automation Becoming Who We Are Between Post-Capitalism and Techno-Fascism big data blogging capitalism ChatGPT claude Cognitive Triage: Practice, Culture and Strategies Communicative Escalation and Cultural Abundance: How Do We Cope? Corporate Culture, Elites and Their Self-Understandings craft creativity critical realism data science Defensive Elites Digital Capitalism and Digital Social Science Digital Distraction, Personal Agency and The Reflexive Imperative Digital Elections, Party Politics and Diplomacy digital elites Digital Inequalities Digital Social Science Digital Sociology digital sociology Digital Universities elites Fragile Movements and Their Politics Cultures generative AI higher education Interested labour Lacan Listening LLMs margaret archer Organising personal morphogenesis Philosophy of Technology platform capitalism platforms Post-Democracy, Depoliticisation and Technocracy post-truth psychoanalysis public engagement public sociology publishing Reading realism reflexivity scholarship sexuality Shadow Mobilization, Astroturfing and Manipulation Social Media Social Media for Academics social media for academics social ontology social theory sociology technology The Content Ecosystem The Intensification of Work theory The Political Economy of Digital Capitalism The Technological History of Digital Capitalism Thinking trump twitter Uncategorized work writing zizek

Post-horror and the epistemic chaos of platform capitalism

It occurred to me yesterday that the epistemological chaos of platform capitalism now figures in popular awareness to a sufficient degree (albeit mediated through epistemically lazy liberal tropes) that its outgrowths now figure in horror films. See the Knock at the Cabin which tells the story of an affable family’s idyllic rural retreat being ruined by a doomsday cult who met on a message board:

Like other post-horror films it plays with the question of who we should trust when the apocalypse comes. The cult members are obviously deranged, with a lingering possibility that derangement has led them to stage an elaborate ruse. But does the epistemically unacceptable basis for their beliefs (meeting on a message board) or the content of those beliefs (the imminent apocalypse) justify assuming they are necessarily wrong?

It is this doubt which an otherwise flawed film plays with expertly over ninety minutes and I think it captures a broader epistemic predicament which is becoming widespread: faith in our doxa is breaking down at the same time as challenges to it are emerging because these are two sides of the same process. This means living with the lingering suspicion that those heralding imminent catastrophe might very well be right, in spite of the reservations we have about who they are and how they came to those views.