Raiding the inarticulate since 2010

accelerated academy acceleration agency AI Algorithmic Authoritarianism and Digital Repression archer Archive Archiving artificial intelligence automation Becoming Who We Are Between Post-Capitalism and Techno-Fascism big data blogging capitalism ChatGPT claude Cognitive Triage: Practice, Culture and Strategies Communicative Escalation and Cultural Abundance: How Do We Cope? Corporate Culture, Elites and Their Self-Understandings craft creativity critical realism data science Defensive Elites Digital Capitalism and Digital Social Science Digital Distraction, Personal Agency and The Reflexive Imperative Digital Elections, Party Politics and Diplomacy digital elites Digital Inequalities Digital Social Science Digital Sociology digital sociology Digital Universities elites Fragile Movements and Their Politics Cultures generative AI higher education Interested labour Lacan Listening LLMs margaret archer Organising personal morphogenesis Philosophy of Technology platform capitalism platforms Post-Democracy, Depoliticisation and Technocracy post-truth psychoanalysis public engagement public sociology publishing Reading realism reflexivity scholarship sexuality Shadow Mobilization, Astroturfing and Manipulation Social Media Social Media for Academics social media for academics social ontology social theory sociology technology The Content Ecosystem The Intensification of Work theory The Political Economy of Digital Capitalism The Technological History of Digital Capitalism Thinking trump twitter Uncategorized work writing zizek

The role of involvement in learning how to learn

I found this reprint from Hubert Dreyfus quite inspiring to engage with again, over a decade since I read the original book. It feels more relevant than ever when considering the constraints of education during the pandemic, with the core challenge posed by Dreyfus of how much involvement can be established remotely being one which anyone teaching via Zoom will have felt over the last year. He describes on pg 169 the significance which that involvement has on the orientation of students towards learning:

teachers can play a crucial role in whether students will withdraw into being disembodied minds or become more and more emotionally involved in the learning situation. If the teacher is detached and computer-like, the students will be too. Conversely, if the teacher shows his involvement in the way he pursues the truth, considers daring hypotheses and interpretations, is open to student’s suggestions and objections, and emotionally dwells on the choices that have lead him to his conclusions and actions, the students will be more likely to let their own successes and failures matter to them, and rerun the choices that lead to these out- comes.

This foregrounds what matters to the educator and to the students. Why do they care about the subject matter? How do they move towards these issues and how does it feel to do so? In this sense, he’s pointing to the significance of the fact the material matters (or doesn’t) to the teacher, as well as the influence this involvement (or absence thereof) has over how students relate to the material. It’s helpful to distinguish between involvement in this evaluative sense of mattering and involvement in the broader Heideggerian sense of embodied relations within a context. The former can be sustained much more easily through telepresence than the latter, even if it might require careful work to ensure it emerges in discussions.

This is why I think reflexivity is key to how we orientate ourselves to remote teaching and learning. We need to be able to surface our concerns, the things that matter to us, in order to make them a platform for discussion. This obviously has value in face-to-face teaching but, I increasingly think, it’s indispensable online.