Raiding the inarticulate since 2010

accelerated academy acceleration AI AI and Posthumanism Algorithmic Authoritarianism and Digital Repression Archive Archiving artificial intelligence Augmenting Reflexivity automation Becoming Who We Are Between Post-Capitalism and Techno-Fascism big data blogging capitalism ChatGPT claude Cognitive Triage: Practice, Culture and Strategies Corporate Culture, Elites and Their Self-Understandings creativity Defensive Elites Digital Capitalism and Digital Social Science Digital Distraction, Personal Agency and The Reflexive Imperative digital education futures Digital Elections, Party Politics and Diplomacy digital elites Digital labour Digital Media and Information Literacy Digital Social Science Digital Sociology digital sociology Digital Universities Dying world elites Emerging tech in education Fragile Movements and Their Politics Cultures generative AI Generative AI for Academics higher education Interested Lacan Listening LLMs LLMs and Human Agency LLMs and Organisations LLMs and Psychopathology margaret archer music Ontology of emerging technologies Organising Philosophy Philosophy of Technology Platform and agency platform capitalism platform university poetry politics Post-Democracy, Depoliticisation and Technocracy public engagement public sociology Reading reflexivity sexuality Shadow Mobilization, Astroturfing and Manipulation Social Media Social Media for Academics social media for academics Social media in higher education social theory sociology technology The Content Ecosystem The Intensification of Work The Political Economy of Digital Capitalism The Technological History of Digital Capitalism Thinking trump twitter Uncategorized writing

A conversation with Phil Brooker about Programming-as-Social Science

In this podcast, we talk to Phillip Brooker about Programming as Social Science. This approach to social inquiry involves using programming as a toolkit for social research, facilitating a style of inquiry above and beyond particular research methods. At a time when we’re dependent upon digital platforms for the core operations of the university, with face-to-face fieldwork being profoundly disrupted, this approach helps us move beyond treating platforms as blackboxes. It’s a really innovative approach to methodology for digital social research which can help us get beyond the tendency to see digital methods as second best alternatives for disrupted fieldwork, inviting creative and expansive approaches to the challenges which we’re currently faced with. If you’re interested in finding out more, Phillip has written an accessible and engaging book and we jointly run the Programming as Social Science network.