Raiding the inarticulate since 2010

accelerated academy acceleration agency AI Algorithmic Authoritarianism and Digital Repression archer Archive Archiving artificial intelligence automation Becoming Who We Are Between Post-Capitalism and Techno-Fascism big data blogging capitalism ChatGPT claude Cognitive Triage: Practice, Culture and Strategies Communicative Escalation and Cultural Abundance: How Do We Cope? Corporate Culture, Elites and Their Self-Understandings craft creativity critical realism data science Defensive Elites Digital Capitalism and Digital Social Science Digital Distraction, Personal Agency and The Reflexive Imperative Digital Elections, Party Politics and Diplomacy digital elites Digital Inequalities Digital Social Science Digital Sociology digital sociology Digital Universities elites Fragile Movements and Their Politics Cultures generative AI higher education Interested labour Lacan Listening LLMs margaret archer Organising personal morphogenesis Philosophy of Technology platform capitalism platforms populism Post-Democracy, Depoliticisation and Technocracy post-truth psychoanalysis public engagement public sociology publishing Reading realism reflexivity scholarship sexuality Shadow Mobilization, Astroturfing and Manipulation Social Media Social Media for Academics social media for academics social ontology social theory sociology technology The Content Ecosystem The Intensification of Work The Political Economy of Digital Capitalism The Technological History of Digital Capitalism Thinking trump twitter Uncategorized work writing zizek

CfP: ‘Social Research in a Sceptical Age’

The current climate of scepticism towards ‘experts’ has put many research practitioners and users on the defensive.  Is it enough simply to assert the value of rigorous methods, or should we be checking, sharpening and improving our tools?  If ‘post-truth’ carries real meaning then the pressure is on researchers to find a positive response – such as clearly communicating our findings and why they matter; and demonstrating how high standards in design, conduct and analysis are built in to our research.

At this stage we are looking for up to 500 words to describe and explain what you’d like to present – with a focus on one or more of these topic areas:

  • Getting the message across
  • The value of narratives
  • Policy evaluation
  • Embedding quality assurance
  • The value of quality in evidence
  • Qualitative innovation
  • Quantitative innovation
  • Involving research participants
  • Dealing with the unexpected

The deadline for submissions is Monday 7 August.  The SRA Events Group will assess all entries and aim to let you know the outcome in September/October.

Presentations will be in parallel workshop sessions of 20 minutes (followed by a 10 minute Q&A).  One presenter per submission will pay a reduced delegate rate of £55.

Abstracts and other details must be submitted using the template Word doc that can be downloaded on our website here:  www.the-sra.org.uk/events

We hope you will consider making a submission for the conference.  And of course please feel free to share this call with colleagues and networks.