Raiding the inarticulate since 2010

accelerated academy acceleration agency AI Algorithmic Authoritarianism and Digital Repression archer Archive Archiving artificial intelligence automation Becoming Who We Are Between Post-Capitalism and Techno-Fascism big data blogging capitalism ChatGPT claude Cognitive Triage: Practice, Culture and Strategies Communicative Escalation and Cultural Abundance: How Do We Cope? Corporate Culture, Elites and Their Self-Understandings craft creativity critical realism data science Defensive Elites Digital Capitalism and Digital Social Science Digital Distraction, Personal Agency and The Reflexive Imperative Digital Elections, Party Politics and Diplomacy digital elites Digital Inequalities Digital Social Science Digital Sociology digital sociology Digital Universities elites Fragile Movements and Their Politics Cultures generative AI higher education Interested labour Lacan Listening LLMs margaret archer Organising personal morphogenesis Philosophy of Technology platform capitalism platforms populism Post-Democracy, Depoliticisation and Technocracy post-truth psychoanalysis public engagement public sociology publishing Reading realism reflexivity scholarship sexuality Shadow Mobilization, Astroturfing and Manipulation Social Media Social Media for Academics social media for academics social ontology social theory sociology technology The Content Ecosystem The Intensification of Work The Political Economy of Digital Capitalism The Technological History of Digital Capitalism Thinking trump twitter Uncategorized work writing zizek

The Epistemic Distance of Data Scientists

A really interesting interview in Jacobin:

One reason I think biases are not more commonly flagged is the enormous disconnect between the way that data is collected and the people who are in charge of building algorithms. Data scientists are well-educated technologists, who often have no experience getting stopped and frisked, for example. They’re taught to be technicians, in fields like math, computer science, and statistics, and to keep the consequences of their work at arm’s length.

They also work in companies and organizations that benefit from the marketing spiel that claims scientific objectivity and fairness, so there’s little pressure to be sure that what they’re doing is, in fact, unbiased. Instead, there’s an unspoken assumption in many start-up companies that whatever is profitable must be good for the world. So while inequality is increased by WMDs, I think it’s also one of the reasons WMDs exist in the first place.

https://www.jacobinmag.com/2016/09/big-data-algorithms-math-facebook-advertisement-marketing/