Raiding the inarticulate since 2010

accelerated academy acceleration agency AI Algorithmic Authoritarianism and Digital Repression archer Archive Archiving artificial intelligence automation Becoming Who We Are Between Post-Capitalism and Techno-Fascism big data blogging capitalism ChatGPT claude Cognitive Triage: Practice, Culture and Strategies Communicative Escalation and Cultural Abundance: How Do We Cope? Corporate Culture, Elites and Their Self-Understandings craft creativity critical realism data science Defensive Elites Digital Capitalism and Digital Social Science Digital Distraction, Personal Agency and The Reflexive Imperative Digital Elections, Party Politics and Diplomacy digital elites Digital Inequalities Digital Social Science Digital Sociology digital sociology Digital Universities elites Fragile Movements and Their Politics Cultures generative AI higher education Interested labour Lacan Listening LLMs margaret archer Organising personal morphogenesis Philosophy of Technology platform capitalism platforms populism Post-Democracy, Depoliticisation and Technocracy post-truth psychoanalysis public engagement public sociology publishing Reading realism reflexivity scholarship sexuality Shadow Mobilization, Astroturfing and Manipulation Social Media Social Media for Academics social media for academics social ontology social theory sociology technology The Content Ecosystem The Intensification of Work The Political Economy of Digital Capitalism The Technological History of Digital Capitalism Thinking trump twitter Uncategorized work writing zizek

the need for the social sciences to reclaim their intellectual authority 

In the final chapter of Social Class in the 21st Century, Mike Savage stresses the need to place processes of social classification under the spotlight and assert their political significance. As he puts it on page 403, this entails the “social sciences getting their hands dirty and seeking to wrest intellectual authority from market researchers, consultants, journals and commentators.” It’s interesting to see the themes of ‘coming crisis’ reiterated in relation to such a different topic.

I’m very interested in the challenges big data poses to this endeavour. Is there a risk that such approaches ‘black box’ social classification and, in doing so, make it harder to “wrest intellectual authority” from the increasingly influential practitioners? This is another example of the links between digital capitalism and digital social science I’m starting to think about for my new project: the tendencies the former encourages in the latter and the difficulties this poses for using the latter to understand the former.

, ,