Raiding the inarticulate since 2010

accelerated academy acceleration agency AI Algorithmic Authoritarianism and Digital Repression archer Archive Archiving artificial intelligence automation Becoming Who We Are Between Post-Capitalism and Techno-Fascism big data blogging capitalism ChatGPT claude Cognitive Triage: Practice, Culture and Strategies Communicative Escalation and Cultural Abundance: How Do We Cope? Corporate Culture, Elites and Their Self-Understandings craft creativity critical realism data science Defensive Elites Digital Capitalism and Digital Social Science Digital Distraction, Personal Agency and The Reflexive Imperative Digital Elections, Party Politics and Diplomacy digital elites Digital Inequalities Digital Social Science Digital Sociology digital sociology Digital Universities elites Fragile Movements and Their Politics Cultures generative AI higher education Interested labour Lacan Listening LLMs margaret archer Organising personal morphogenesis Philosophy of Technology platform capitalism platforms populism Post-Democracy, Depoliticisation and Technocracy post-truth psychoanalysis public engagement public sociology publishing Reading realism reflexivity scholarship sexuality Shadow Mobilization, Astroturfing and Manipulation Social Media Social Media for Academics social media for academics social ontology social theory sociology technology The Content Ecosystem The Intensification of Work The Political Economy of Digital Capitalism The Technological History of Digital Capitalism Thinking trump twitter Uncategorized work writing zizek

This looks great: ‘Weber/Simmel antagonisms’ conference

Not great enough to travel 6 hours and pay £75 for but pretty great nonetheless:

Weber/ Simmel antagonisms

Staged dialogues

University of Edinburgh

10/11 December 2015

A conference organized by the Max Weber Group of the British Sociological Association  & Sociology Edinburgh

Call for outlines

Much has been said about the strong oppositions between Simmel and Weber as founding fathers of sociology – as well as about their shared concerns. Capitalism and culture, ‘worlds’ and their tensions, rationalization and objectivation, the city, music, the methodology of the social sciences and ideal types, equally exercised their thought and yielded very different creatures.

But rather than merely intellectual or methodological quarrels, the antagonisms between Simmel and Weber engaged their whole way of being and acting in the world – the constantly renewed aspiration yet impossibility of reconciliation with oneself and the world, for Simmel; agonic tension, struggle with oneself and the world, for Weber. This is perhaps the reason why Weber/Simmel antagonisms have had continuity in social theory and shaped some of its major currents of thought. More importantly perhaps they spur us to be and act in the world in very different ways: hence this conference, which does not only explore these differences, but stages them.

The format of the conference is inspired after the staging of the Tarde/Durkheim debate by Latour/Karsenti, but rather than recreating a real debate with prominent actors, we invite outlines for short ‘imagined dialogues’ between Weber and Simmel on topics which were addressed by both. The topics chosen should not be of merely scholarly interest but rather capture problematics mattering today.

Keynote dialogues

Money

Nigel Dodd (LSE)………………………………… ‘Simmel’

Geoff Ingham (Cambridge)…………………… ‘Weber’

Capitalism (TBC)

Scott Lash (Goldsmiths)…………………………’Simmel’

Uta Gerhardt (Heidelberg)……………………..’Weber‘

Verstehen and writing

Rosalie Dion (Montréal)………………………. ‘Simmel’

Barbara Theriault (Montréal)………………..’Weber’

Conflict

Thomas Kemple (UBC)……………….……..… ‘Simmel’

Austin Harrington (Leeds)…………….…….. ‘Weber’

Philosophical & political stance

Olli Pyyhtinen (Tampere)……………….…… ‘Simmel’

Carlos Frade (Salford)…………………………. ‘Weber’

Outlines can be submitted by pairs or by individual academics and students. PhD students are particularly encouraged to take part. Selected pairs will be asked to play their dialogues at the conference. If you are an individual with a dialogue but without a partner, we can supply one from our Edinburgh team!

Outlines should include:
– the theme chosen for their dialogue
– the key texts serving as a basis for the dialogue;
–  a starting imagined dialogue between Weber and Simmel, of about 500 words.
Deadline for submission:  29 May 2015
Send to: webersimmel@ed.ac.uk
The selected applicants will then be invited to submit their fully written dialogues in advance of the conference. This will allow the Conference committee to make suggestions and above all to plan the staging of the dialogues. The dialogues will be read/acted at the Conference, and will be recorded and put on line.
We are aiming to put together a special issue of Classical Sociology featuring some of the best dialogues.

Fee:
Academics   £75
Students   £50
We are currently seeking to arrange travel/accommodation grants for about 10 participants from the UK and Europe (or a contribution towards costs for travel from further afield). These are meant to encourage participation from students and early careers researchers without a permanent University contract. If you are in such case and would like to be considered for a grant please let us know when you submit your outline.