Raiding the inarticulate since 2010

accelerated academy acceleration agency AI Algorithmic Authoritarianism and Digital Repression archer Archive Archiving artificial intelligence automation Becoming Who We Are Between Post-Capitalism and Techno-Fascism big data blogging capitalism ChatGPT claude Cognitive Triage: Practice, Culture and Strategies Communicative Escalation and Cultural Abundance: How Do We Cope? Corporate Culture, Elites and Their Self-Understandings craft creativity critical realism data science Defensive Elites Digital Capitalism and Digital Social Science Digital Distraction, Personal Agency and The Reflexive Imperative Digital Elections, Party Politics and Diplomacy digital elites Digital Inequalities Digital Social Science Digital Sociology digital sociology Digital Universities elites Fragile Movements and Their Politics Cultures generative AI higher education Interested labour Lacan Listening LLMs margaret archer Organising personal morphogenesis Philosophy of Technology platform capitalism platforms Post-Democracy, Depoliticisation and Technocracy post-truth psychoanalysis public engagement public sociology publishing Reading realism reflexivity scholarship sexuality Shadow Mobilization, Astroturfing and Manipulation Social Media Social Media for Academics social media for academics social ontology social theory sociology technology The Content Ecosystem The Intensification of Work theory The Political Economy of Digital Capitalism The Technological History of Digital Capitalism Thinking trump twitter Uncategorized work writing zizek

Repeating yourself in academia

I just did a short phone interview about asexuality and I was struck by the extent to which I feel I’ve been repeating myself for the last couple of years. I have nothing new to say on the subject and the repetition involved in talking about it is starting to get a bit weird. There are a few more pieces of writing I’m committed to (a chapter in a psychology handbook and two theoretical articles which use asexuality as a case study) after which I’ll probably stop writing about it. This seems a shame on one level. I feel as if I haven’t really made full use of the data I collected (8 in depth interviews and 174 open response questionnaires for which many wrote essay length responses) and the best empirical piece I wrote is stuck in an edited book that no one other than institutional libraries will ever buy. At some point I still want to apply for funding for the project, which if you’ve ever talked to me in person about asexuality I’ve probably told you about, that would try and situate asexuality (as well as trans, poly and kink) within a broader historical account of socio-cultural change. But that’s something I won’t be thinking seriously about for at least a couple of years. For now, I’d just like to stop repeating myself and do something new.