Raiding the inarticulate since 2010

accelerated academy acceleration agency AI Algorithmic Authoritarianism and Digital Repression archer Archive Archiving artificial intelligence automation Becoming Who We Are Between Post-Capitalism and Techno-Fascism big data blogging capitalism ChatGPT claude Cognitive Triage: Practice, Culture and Strategies Communicative Escalation and Cultural Abundance: How Do We Cope? Corporate Culture, Elites and Their Self-Understandings craft creativity critical realism data science Defensive Elites Digital Capitalism and Digital Social Science Digital Distraction, Personal Agency and The Reflexive Imperative Digital Elections, Party Politics and Diplomacy digital elites Digital Inequalities Digital Social Science Digital Sociology digital sociology Digital Universities elites Fragile Movements and Their Politics Cultures generative AI higher education Interested labour Lacan Listening LLMs margaret archer Organising personal morphogenesis Philosophy of Technology platform capitalism platforms Post-Democracy, Depoliticisation and Technocracy post-truth psychoanalysis public engagement public sociology publishing Reading realism reflexivity scholarship sexuality Shadow Mobilization, Astroturfing and Manipulation Social Media Social Media for Academics social media for academics social ontology social theory sociology technology The Content Ecosystem The Intensification of Work theory The Political Economy of Digital Capitalism The Technological History of Digital Capitalism Thinking trump twitter Uncategorized work writing zizek

The foundation of relational sociology

To maintain that social relations have a reality of their own (sui generis) means saying that they are not simply derived from something else, but reflect an order of reality of their own with internal dynamics that require theoretical-practical conceptualization. This order of reality is not derivable from or reduicble to this or that particular factor or variable (for example, ‘power’, as Elias maintains), but derives from the relatedness itself of the social order.

This relational ontology has, so to speak, an empirical foundation that can be known, in part, experientially. In the system of organic reference (body), a person cannot exist without air and without food, but the former cannot be reduced to the latter. In the system of social reference (social forms) the human being cannot exist without relations with others. These relations are what ‘constitutes’ his or her being a person, and are like the air and food necessary for the body. Were the relation with the other to be suspended, so too would the relation with the self. This, and nothing else, is what sociology deals with.

– Relational Sociology: A new paradigm for the social sciences. Pg 13. By Pierpaolo Donati