Mark Carrigan

Raiding the inarticulate since 2010

accelerated academy acceleration agency Algorithmic Authoritarianism and Digital Repression Archive Archiving automation Becoming Who We Are Between Post-Capitalism and Techno-Fascism big data blogging capitalism ChatGPT claude Cognitive Triage: Practice, Culture and Strategies Communicative Escalation and Cultural Abundance: How Do We Cope? Corporate Culture, Elites and Their Self-Understandings craft creativity critical realism data science Defensive Elites Digital Capitalism Digital Capitalism and Digital Social Science Digital Distraction, Personal Agency and The Reflexive Imperative Digital Elections, Party Politics and Diplomacy digital elites Digital Inequalities Digital Social Science Digital Sociology digital sociology Digital Universities distraction elites Fragile Movements and Their Politics Cultures generative AI higher education Interested internal conversation labour Lacan Listening margaret archer Organising personal morphogenesis Philosophy of Technology platform capitalism platforms politics populism Post-Democracy, Depoliticisation and Technocracy post-truth public engagement public sociology publishing quantified self Reading realism reflexivity sexuality Shadow Mobilization, Astroturfing and Manipulation Social Media Social Media for Academics social media for academics social ontology social theory sociology technology The Content Ecosystem The Intensification of Work The Political Economy of Digital Capitalism The Sharing Economy The Technological History of Digital Capitalism Thinking trump twitter Uncategorized work writing zizek

Will Starmer’s Labour empower the far-right over the next ten years?

I’ve been increasingly preoccupied by the prospect that Starmer’s Labour will follow a similar trajectory to Macron’s government: getting elected from the centre before shifting to the right, failing to address (or even exacerbating) the underlying mechanisms driving the fascist creep, legitimating their agenda through perpetual triangulation, before (it seems likely) being supplanted by the very party he styled himself as a bulwark against. Didier Fassin captures this trajectory sunccintly here:

From the start of his presidency, Macron has regarded RN as his sole adversary. The left was divided, and he systematically discredited it, even demonising its most radical fringe, France Unbowed. His objective was to occupy the right of French politics, wiping out the threat from Le Pen’s party and the Republicans. There were three components to this strategy. First, his harsh stance on law and order. Second, his renewed focus on Muslims, and his fight against what he termed “Islamist separatism”. And third, and above all, his disproportionate focus on immigration, culminating in a heated, year-long debate about a controversial new bill that restricted migrants’ rights and benefits. When this law, called “shameful” by the Human Rights League, was voted in on December 2023, Le Pen described it as an “ideological victory”.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/jun/25/emmanuel-macron-marine-le-pen-france-far-right-government

The combined Conservative and Reform vote is 37% as of last week’s polls. The fragmentation of the right is an expression of recomposition not destruction. Imagine how strong a unified right built around ‘national conservative’ principles could be five years down the line if a Starmer government has done little to address the spiralling inequalities of post-austerity Britain. I’m confident things will get a little better under Labour (how could they not?) but strongly suspect that could be a prelude to things getting much much worse.