Skip to content
Mark Carrigan

Raiding the inarticulate since 2010

  • Home
  • About Me
  • Events
  • Research
    • LLMs and social life
    • Higher education
    • Psychodynamics
    • Realism and social theory
    • Platforms
    • Academic practice
  • Stuff I Like
    • Urban Geometries
  • Public writing
  • Publications
  • Media coverage
  • Get In Touch
  • LinkedIn
  • SoundCloud
  • YouTube
  • Spotify

Why did Giddens largely ignore Bourdieu?

This is an interesting question and provocative potential explanation by Magne Flemmen:

In the review, Giddens makes what might be an interesting concession, when he says that no one has contributed more to overcoming the objectivism- subjectivism divide than Bourdieu. Recall that this was also the stated ambition of Giddens’ own work. Should this be taken to mean that Giddens had come to see Bourdieu as beating him “in his own game”?

https://magneflemmen.com/2022/08/10/giddens-strange-neglect-of-bourdieu/

Share this:

  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
Like Loading…
January 14, 2024
bourdieu, giddens, Reading Archer, social theory
Commonplace book, Realism and social theory
  • Comment
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    Mark Carrigan
    Join 5,626 other subscribers

    Have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.

  • Mark Carrigan
    Copy shortlinkView post in Reader
    Manage subscriptionsSign upLog in
    Report this content
    Collapse this bar
%d